Thursday, 28 August 2014

Business and mission VS Business as mission



The probable prediction of business as mission on unreached areas in future and what required from probable missionaries


Introduction
                Due to the antagonistic environment against official entry of pastors and missionaries, creative methods and differentiated approaches have recently been launched. Therefore, dual identities such as teachers as missionaries or doctors as missionaries are so commonly accepted that church plant is achieved. In addition to this, it is easily seen that missionaries do the mission work while working as staffs at non-governmental organization (NGO) or participating humanitarian behaviours. In this context, Establishing businesses at the unreached areas located in 10/40 windows as the effective tool of preaching gospel has been debated for a long time among many dual identities. Although the concept of “business as mission” has become an effective mission strategy and popular among probable missionaries, there have been various problems that rise. For example, there are times when operating a business directly deals with the core characteristics of market mechanism, which conflicts with biblical teachings. In this paper, the mission strategy of business as mission will be approached from certain analytical issues such as predictable trend, effectiveness and qualifications required from missionaries, who is interested in mission strategy of business as mission. In order for these issues to be examined, insights and actual enlightenments gained through the participation of conference and dialogue with missionaries will be shown in this paper.

Recent situations and future trend of business as mission in unreached areas
                In essence, most of unreached countries have closed the door against official entry of pastors and missionaries. Priest states “the remaining ‘unreached’ regions of the world, with few exceptions, do not allow the presence of full-time foreign religious professionals devoting themselves to the task of religious conversion”[1] From the governmental perspectives of unreached countries, the things they need are any types of resources which help their countries escape from diseases, famine, poverty and injustice. Even if they fail to recognize that only the gospel of Jesus and not humanitarian aid alone,  can ultimately free their people from all these bondages of sin. This is where the dual identity is birthed. At the same time, this is where the integration of secular and sacred sector of being missionary should be achieved to facilitate God’s work wisely. Prior to the advent of unwelcoming environment against the official religious professionals, the dichotomy between secular and sacred sector of being a staff at the kingdom of God was generally accepted. But, it is easily seen that the mixture of various ratios between secular and sacred in missionaries is differentiated in unreached countries.
                In this context, the conflict between context and text has existed as one of imperative issues in terms of mission strategy. Specifically speaking, in an environmental context, when one missionary encounters a desperate need in the unreached country for the supply of medicines and elimination of diseases, the missionary is easily tempted to construct the hospital rather than pursuing the ultimate goal of spreading gospel. It is possible to end up being a manager of building even if this missionary is engaged in the work of God. When conversing with the founder of InterCP, which has professionally focused on missions in Islamic countries, he stated,
“When many doctors, who wanted to use their profession as mission tool, asked me to build the hospital as a tool of mission in Uzbekistan in the beginning of 1980, I rebuked their proposal. Instead, I successfully earned the used bus from Daewoo, one of conglomerates in Korea, in a complimentary way on the condition that we established the logo of company as the advertisement outside the refurbished bus wherever we go. We remodeled inside of the bus and made one specific partition in which every patient received the gospel message and pouring out of prayer no matter how they were diagnosed”.
This above case is classified as one of successful case of mission works. The work of God was well established while interacting with what the environmental context requires missionaries to do successfully. However, when the cultural context or environmental context overwhelms a missionary, their destiny ends up being a manager of building or losing their number one priority completely. Likewise, running a business can bombard missionaries to suffocate their number one priority, spreading the Gospel.
                In terms of running a business as mission tool, the absence of profit out of business would be the tough obstacle to the concept of business as mission. But, in reality, making profits out of business in unreached countries seems harder than the way business as mission is easily fantasized. When participating at the InterCP conference as a staff of Toronto branch in Feb, 2014, new insights and enlightenments were gained by the seminar I joined. The presenter stated “if you make profits out of business embarked in the unreached countries, your customer should be those who are positioned in the top 2% of whole population. Their purchasing power is the stronger than the middle class of United States.” And he added “if foreigners compete with local people, they can never survive. Therefore, those who think of planting business should choose the item with which local people can never think of launching business.”  But, rather than efforts of launching cutting-edge technology-based business or a new creative item, it has widely seen that many people are engaged with commerce-based business in unreached countries. Based on my personal talk with a missionary who did God’s work in Kenya, those who venture into new businesses are supposed to bring the item which was either a big hit or trend in the developed countries. For example, it was easily observed that people brought dried grains to the specific place where couples of grain grinder machines in the beginning of 1980 in Korea. These machines disappeared long ago even if these made profits at this time. The missionary predicted that the trade of importing these grain grinder machines could match with the developmental stage of African economy.
                The industry has its courses in terms of developmental achievement. In other words, in order for information technology (IT) industry to be developed, all the infrastructures have to be established prior to the establishment of the further complex industry. Even if industrial structures and development of each unreached country have idiosyncratic features due to the local environment, most of unreached countries have no liberty from the application of predictable stages most developed countries have already taken. Accordingly, many Christians try to do businesses by predicting what the specific unreached country needs and bringing the item to the market based on the speculation of industrial stage on which it sits. This causes Christian business entrepreneurs to depend on the commerce and trade. And this is why old-fashioned business trend or items which have already disappeared in developed countries are easily observed in unreached countries. However, it has been reported that there are intense competition, fraudulent schemes, and false activities among so-called Christians. The founder of the InterCP said “When visiting any unreached country to observe the local environment, be very careful not to say anything about the item you are going to launch when encountering people, especially introducing themselves as either missionaries or pastors.”  And he stated
“One Christian tried to bring used locomotives to do the railroad business in Uzbekistan. So, he tried to make contract with Korean National Railroad (KORAIL). Before he put the signature on the contract, he went to Uzbekistan to observe the local environment. During his stay, he encountered one Korean, who introduced himself as a pastor. Experiencing deeply gladness in him and graceful help from him, he talked with him about many issues and his business plan blurted out from his mouth. Result? Other person took the contract from KORAIL.”
During ten years of my immigration in Canada, I have seen some miserable stories that Korean people stole money from Koreans by taking disadvantage of their linguistic weakness. It is very tragic to see similar cases in mission fields. Apart from this, the certain type of exploitation seems to be unavoidable when it comes to the profit. Without mentioning the unfair treatment of labor force and sweatshop labor in less-privileged countries regarding these items such as coffee, cotton and cocoa, profit seems to be accompanied by the exploitation even if any kinds of businesses are established in mission field. In addition to this, the conversation I had with one missionary, who has ten years of mission work in northern Vietnam when visiting Hanoi last summer still seems to echo around the ears. He stated “due to the increase of labor cost in China, lots of assembly lines and factory have moved to Vietnam.” From the ultimate perspective of nature in business, it is very evident that once the labor cost is increased and human right becomes more protected, capital starts moving from place to place, in which the maximization of profit can become possible. Putting all these characteristics of local environment and fundamental elements of business together, it seems to me that if one Christian business man does any kind of business in unreached country, it would better for him to gain the profit out of business and seek out the truthful missionaries. Then, it is advised to make donation to them as the supplementary help to plant underground churches.
                The presenter at the conference introduced the concept “business and mission” instead of “business as mission.” Business and mission means that if one Christian does the business and gain the profit out of it, he cannot be classified as a missionary. It seems to me that when gaining profits from the business, he would be better to remain as a supporter to help missionaries, who are truthful to their role as missionaries.  In other words, when Christians attempt to implement business as the effective tool of mission, according to the business as mission model, profit needs to be abandoned. The struggling challenge is that although Christians start business with the intention of putting the profit into missional goals, most of them are tempted by greed if the business gracefully arrives at the profitable point. When business does not make profit in the sector of “business and mission”, this would be problematic. However, whether business does not make profit or does make profit, both sides can cause Christians to face challenging issues in the sector of “business as mission”. Although the integration of secular and sacred sector of engaging in God’s work is popular, it seems wise for the separation of the two sectors and so that differentiated missionaries need to work in collaboration on the soil of unreached countries.

Effectiveness of business as mission and requirement of probable missionaries
                Whether approaching into businesses as supplementary tools to support mission financially or running business in itself as mission tools, business has bundle of inextricable philosophies in the definition of business which are prevalent among people, even Christians. The problem is that these generally accepted thoughts and teachings in business are unbiblical. For example, in order for one specific item to be competitive in the market, it is generally explained that the persistent focus on the strength point should be emphasized rather than being attentive to the weakness. And this basic concept, being taught in the fundamental business principles, seems to have taken its firm fortress in the intellectual realm of many Christians without any defiance. However, the strength point of one specific item or business is to be emphasized while the weakness should be dealt biblically. Biblical scripture has the contradictory approach against the very basic fundamental of business.2 Corinthians 9 says “But he said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ’s power may rest on me.” In addition to this, this excerpt from documentation on tentmakers seems to demonstrate how deeply Christians have been embedded with plausible teachings and learnings.
             “A tentmaker in China reminded me recently of the standard business teaching, “Go with your strengths.” The thinking is that if you strive to become proficient in a weak area, it will take too much time and effort away from working in the areas in which you are most productive and profitable. In other words, if you work to be good at everything, you will be great at nothing. Peter Drucker, the management guru, agrees, “Don’t focus on building up your weaknesses. Understand your strengths and place yourself in a position where there strengths count. Your strengths are what will carry you through to success…” It sounds like solid advice, but there is one problem. In seeking to redeem our corner of world, we (those in business) are not only fighting the battle in the marketplace, we are also doing battle in the heavenlies. And in fighting the Evil One, we understand that he does not fight fair. Rarely does he attack our strengths. Normally, he attacks our weaknesses. Thus, as tentmakers, we need to build on our strengths while fortifying our weaknesses, for it is our weaknesses that will knock us off the field.”[2]
Secondly, what is generally accepted among even Christians, who are interested in launching business in unreached countries, is that in times of economic recession, the substantial size of lay-off is unavoidable to maintain the status quo or gain the surplus from restructuring human resources, not to speak of the suspension of investment. But, this response against an economic recession always does not seem to be righteous based on the depth of biblical understanding. Matthew 20:1-16 describes one owner of vineyard who hires employees at various times. My personal meditation on this biblical scripture is not about the unfair treatment of pay but the owner of business who does not seem to worry about the money when hiring people. What if he had to hire people in the economic recession while hearing all the complaints from other employees? Of course, the biblical scripture does not say anything about economic cycles. However, neither economic boom nor economic recession seems to be imperative issue. Among many Christian business men, there is one man, named Do Won Chang who founded “Forever 21”, one of the fastest growing merchandise clothing companies. It is clearly said that “in the year of 2008, which United States was financially devastated, our goal was not to satisfy certain amount of profit, but to hire 7,000 employees.”[3] Against the excruciating environment financially, forever 21 tried to hire 7,000 employees and opened up the shops whereas many fashion brands followed after one of the business fundamentals, many future missionaries accept easily with unfiltered through biblical lenses. Result? It was a huge success. And when asked by many reporters and some who were filled with jealousy to answer the secret of success, he said “I loved God with all my heart”[4] it is very evident that God performed something phenomenon beyond the horizon of our intelligence. However, if someone confessed that the success of business is to love God with all my heart, how do non-believers respond? In my speculation, even if probable missionaries acquired many types of trainings administered in any mission organization, it is evident that they will be ineffective on unreached areas unless they abandon the two prevalent secular business strategies, which are treated as rational and common knowledge. In realistic sense, it is very evident that missionaries are dispatched from developed countries to underdeveloped countries. In other words, probable applicants for becoming missionaries must have their knowledge and values, which have been strengthened through all the secularized systems, conquered by biblical values. What if missionaries, determined to establish a certain business as mission, witness Christ as our ultimate savior while allowing the certain exploitation of either labor forces or natural resources? The failure of integrating a life of witness with Christian ethics in a holistic way can cause intelligent local people to reject Jesus inside even if the effort of delivering Gospel is achieved passionately.
Accordingly, the applicants for mission need to bring secularized values and plausible teachings under the biblical microscope so that they may acquire a truthful discernment as the “pre-field experiences”[5] it seems that daily struggles and battle with secular values prior to the arrival of unreached countries make missionaries end up being the truthful missionaries. Tom says “workers who did not have a daily devotional life prior to moving overseas are clearly less effective than those who did.”[6] In this context, a daily devotional life seems to be something achieved by the applicants voluntarily, willingly and persistently. And it is believed that this devotional life would have no relation with any types of trainings established through the curriculum of mission organization. After all, who you are in front of God and what you do are destined to be extended in the unreached areas. Tom states, “obviously, those who are better witnesses at home are more likely to be better witnesses overseas.”[7]

Conclusion
There are evident mixtures of various methods or approaches to missions in unreached areas. Different approaches are like different colours. The different colours demonstrate how the different colours come together in order to make a picture. Sometimes, it seems to be very chaotic and confusion with the absence of solid examples and role models. In this chaotic atmosphere, the establishment of business has been examined from a variety of angle as one of approaches into local people. It is believed that business can be an effective tool which can endow local people with the self-reliance to finance churches as a further step, not to speak of a delivering tool of Gospel. However, where there is a profit, there is the battle with the greed. Business creates the tension whether it makes profits or loses money. After all, whether we are to become the heaven-anchored people or not is, in my analysis, the primary matter. And these excruciating process and persistent struggles are to be done as pre-field experiences predominantly. It seems evident that we are tempted to testify who we are by what we do. However, from biblical perspective, who we are determines what we do. In other words, who we are during pre-field time period will be demonstrated on mission field. Personally, I have heard that one missionary who gave birth to the baby in Muslim country instead of Canada and put the child to the local school instead of the international school. And I still remember that the reason why Korea experienced the revival was the decisive willingness through which many missionaries never left Korea despite the hazardous time caused by the Korean War. Ultimately, how deeply the inner world of probable missionaries are conquered by God is the most essential key in terms of unreached mission.

















Bibliography
Lai, Patrick. Tentmaking: Business as Missions. Waynesboro, GA: Authentic, 2005.

Snodderly, Beth, and A. Scott Moreau. Evangelical and Frontier Mission Perspectives on the Global Progress of the Gospel. Eugene, Or.: Wipf and Stock, 2011.

Steffen, Tom A, and Barnett. Business as Mission: From Impoverished to Empowered. Pasadena, Calif.: William Carey Library, 2006.
            
www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbzX61cO318










[1] Snodderly and Moreau, Evangelical and Frontier Mission Perspectives on the Global Progress of the Gospel, 296.
[2] Lai, Tentmaking, 371.
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbzX61cO318
[4] Ibid.                                                                                        
[5] Steffen, Business as Mission, 81.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Ibid., 84.

No comments:

Post a Comment